Electronic Portfolios: Collect, Select, Reflect!

It is easy to think of electronic portfolios in terms of a folder in which to store information. However, this is a too narrow definition of the term in relation in a didactical context. Otnes (2002) argues that “the notion of a folder is diverse, and is connected with both a form of learning and a form of evaluation” (p. 176, my translation). From this definition we see that it is way more than a dusty drawer in which to stuff paper documents. As a form of learning, one should emphasise that electronic portfolio work is a process, and students may edit and rearrange continually. Yancy (2001) suggests that the process of portfolio work is a process of collection, selection, and selection, as my title also indicates. In order to get a better grasp of how this works, I would like to use my own blogging as an example. In the EDU3084: Digital Competence course, we practice electronic portfolio work by using WordPress as a working portfolio displaying our learning processes and text productions. The threshold for publishing should remain low, albeit the texts should aim to be related to an educational related theme. As the collection increases, there comes a time when the students are asked to select the work they are most proud of, or the work that is most related to a given exam task. The students, then, most significantly reflect on their selections in order to exhibit a higher taxonomical level. This work is included in a production folder which functions more as summative assessment at the end of a course. The working portfolio is, by contrast, a dynamic and interacting unit (cf. Otnes 2003, p. 87). Barrett calls these for “Learning (Formative) portfolios” and “Assessment (Summative) portfolios” respectively.

Yancy (2001) argues that open electronic portfolios (e.g., PLE), or open with restrictions (e.g., LMS) could enhance the learning processes: “First, precisely because they make learning visible, portfolios allow both faculty and students to focus on learning in a new way. Portfolios bring together visibility, process, and reflection as students chart and interpret their own learning” (p. 19). Since peer-reviewing is not only accepted, but welcomed, students can freely comment and support one another’s learning processes. A challenge, however, could be those of plagiarism. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “plagiarism” as “to use the words or ideas of another person as if they were your own words or ideas” (Merriam-Webster, 2014: “plagiarism”). While plain copying and pasting is somewhat more or less easily detected, using another person’s ideas as if it were your own ideas is something much more problematic as it is very broadly defined. A peril might be that exemplary students might underperform in open and visible portfolios in fear of being plagiarised. Luckily, re-blogging is a helpful feature that credits the author’s work.

What distinguishes electronic portfolios from analogue portfolios is, according to Otnes (2002) that they make use of media-specific features such as multimodality, interactivity, and hypertextuality (cf. Schwebs and Otnes, 2001). Pictures, audio samples, video files, and other semiotic resources can be utilized to the maximum. Students can also communicate by chatting and commenting. The process of reading a text is altered, considering the amount of hypertext. Students can link pages to words, sentences and pictures, so that readers can explore more carefully some aspects of the text than others.

For those of you that are still in doubt whether or not electronic portfolios, e.g. by blogging, is a good idea for your class, there is today a lot more freedom of choice in terms of privacy settings than just a couple of years ago. WordPress allows you to publish privately, as well as publicly. In that way, you can control the students’ text before they are published publicly, if that should be in your interest. For the lower levels and ESL classes, this could be helpful strategy to get rid of those typos. Still, an important feature of the electronic working portfolio is that you can at any time edit and update published work.


 (Student producing text for an electronic portfolio in the classroom. Flickr – Brad Flickinger)


Barrett, H. (2001). Electronic Portfolios. In: Educational Technology: An Encyclopedia [Online]. Available at: http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/encyclopediaentry.htm [Accessed: 01.02.2014]

Otnes, H. (2002). Skjermbaserte fellestekster. Digitale mapper og hypertekstskriving. In T. L. Hoel & S. R. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Et utdanningssystem i endring. IKT og læring. (pp. 175-189). Oslo: Gyldendal.

Otnes, H. (2003). Arkivskuff eller læringsarena? Lærings-og dokumentasjonssjangrer i digitale mapper. In O. Dysthe & K. S. Engelsen (Eds.), Mapper som pedagogisk redskap. Perspektiver og erfaringer. (pp. 85-112). Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.

Schwebs, T., & Otnes, H. (2001). Tekst. no: sjangrer og strukturer i digitale medier. Oslo: Cappelen/LNU.

Yancey, K. B. (2001). Digitized Student Portfolios. In B. L. Cambridge, S. Kahn, D. P. Tompkins & K. B. Yancey (Eds.), Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning (pp. 15-30). Washington, D. C.: American Association for Higher Education.


8 thoughts on “Electronic Portfolios: Collect, Select, Reflect!

  1. Hi Kim-Daniel,
    you have written a very thorough analysis, as always :-). I would like to comment on the aspect of visibility. While I can see that it might be very motivating for students to see what they have achieved and get positive feedback not only from their teacher but also from classmates I think again that the teacher’s supervision and input is crucial especially in the beginning when a blog is being set up. I would not mind typos so much but comments that could be construed as negative.
    I am just thinking about an incident at school where a student’s first comment on another student’s presentation was: “You made a mistake there.” While the situation was already pretty awkward, I think it would be much worse if such a comment would turn up in writing, on a blog, where there is no teacher who could at once put the comment into context and remind the student how to give appropriate feedback.
    I am not saying that the benefits of having a blog would not outnumber the disadvantages. As always it should just be done properly. This would mean to no only focus on teaching the skills necessary for creating a blog but also include a thorough and repeated discussion on netiquette which would fall again into the domain of attitudes. We seem to always be coming back to this topic.

  2. Hi Kim-Daniel,
    one more thing. I find it always a little bit daunting to see such long paragraphs. It either makes me want to take out my red pen or to quit reading right away, depending on my state of mind. So maybe you could make life easier for your followers to shorten you paragraphs a little bit?
    Nice picture by the way, have you made it yourself? Is it from your lush island?
    Hope you have remembered to call your mum, today:-)
    Happy mother’s day

  3. Hi Silke,
    I appreciate your remarks in terms of visibility and electronic portfolios. I think, as I have mentioned in one of your posts, that the teacher must undertake the role as monitor in the digital classroom. If she sees any negative feedback, this must be addressed. Moreover, I believe it is important to address these issues before initiating the process of creating blogs in the classroom. Students need to be informed, in advance, that only positive and constructive feedback should occur on the blog, provided that this is a public blog (functioning as a presentation folder). The photo is credited to Brad Flickinger, and has a Creative Commons license. My mother has received an electronic Mother’s day card already, so cookie points for her sole heir haha.
    Happy mother’s day,

    • Hi Kim-Daniel,
      I think for someone who s undecided about using digital tools in the language classroom and would read both our blogs it would probably be like having an angle sitting on one shoulder and a little devil on the other. Take your pick here. Good thing that we can agree a little bit more on other things. I still enjoy our discussions.

  4. Hi KIm Daniel and Silke,
    I’ve been following your communication with great interest. I also want to give you credit, Kim Daniel, for pointing out in your main blog entry, the options in the privacy settings that are available today. As teachers, we always need to ask ourselves with what, and if so, why, we want our students to “go public” with their school work. I have had students who are reluctant to going public because they have severe dyslexia problems. For these students I have found other solutions.

  5. Her er det meste allerede sagt – både av bloggeier og kommentatorene. Det er flott at du sammenholder flere artikler, Kim Daniel. Og det er grundige og gode refleksjoner du har. Særlig setter jeg pris på at du gjør oppmersksom på valgmulighetene som fins når det gjelder graden av offentlighet.

  6. Pingback: Commenting blog entries | Digital undervisning

  7. Pingback: Obligatory Blog Posts | Kim-Daniel's Digital Didactical Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s